The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision
A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it

Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor of the exchequer, will never have a better moment to make bold changes than the budget she presented on October 30th. She had a mandate to fix public services, a huge parliamentary majority and four months to work out how to raise taxes and encourage growth. In the end, she offered an odd mix of eye-popping numbers and small-bore thinking. She has taken steps to fix Britain’s crumbling public services, chronic underinvestment and fairy-tale fiscal forecasts. But she has lost her best chance at reform.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Large numbers, narrow vision”

From the November 2nd 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Donald Trump was right. Daylight Saving Time needs to go
Evidence on the health costs is piling up

Why the IMF should bail out a serial deadbeat
Under President Javier Milei, Argentina has changed

How America could end up making China great again
A big beautiful opportunity
President Trump’s mindless tariffs will cause economic havoc
But the rest of the world can limit the damage
Lift sanctions to give Syria a chance of rebuilding
Our poll shows Syrians trust their new leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa. So should the West
Why Marine Le Pen should be allowed to run for president
Punish the offender without also punishing French democracy