The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision
A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it

Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor of the exchequer, will never have a better moment to make bold changes than the budget she presented on October 30th. She had a mandate to fix public services, a huge parliamentary majority and four months to work out how to raise taxes and encourage growth. In the end, she offered an odd mix of eye-popping numbers and small-bore thinking. She has taken steps to fix Britain’s crumbling public services, chronic underinvestment and fairy-tale fiscal forecasts. But she has lost her best chance at reform.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Large numbers, narrow vision”

From the November 2nd 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
Africa’s most admired dictator rolls the dice
Kagame’s intervention in Congo threatens his legacy at home

The stunning decline of the preference for having boys
Millions of girls were aborted for being girls. Now parents often lean towards them

America’s tax on foreign investors could do more damage than tariffs
Provisions in the Republican budget are a dangerous step
Myanmar is a demonstration of Chinese hegemony in action
China is playing all sides in the country’s bloody civil war
The West is rethinking how to fight wars
Ukraine’s daring raid on Russia has lessons for European armed forces. But they need cash, too
First he busted gangs. Now Nayib Bukele busts critics
El Salvador’s president has all the tools of repression he needs to stay in power indefinitely