The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision
A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it

Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor of the exchequer, will never have a better moment to make bold changes than the budget she presented on October 30th. She had a mandate to fix public services, a huge parliamentary majority and four months to work out how to raise taxes and encourage growth. In the end, she offered an odd mix of eye-popping numbers and small-bore thinking. She has taken steps to fix Britain’s crumbling public services, chronic underinvestment and fairy-tale fiscal forecasts. But she has lost her best chance at reform.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Large numbers, narrow vision”

From the November 2nd 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the edition
The plan to protect America by shooting down missiles mid-air
It’s not as outlandish as it sounds

The man with a plan for Vietnam
A Communist Party hard man has to rescue Asia’s great success story

MAGA’s assault on science is an act of grievous self-harm
America will pay the price most of all
How Poland can keep its place at the heart of Europe
If it turns inward, the country and continent will lose out
The best part of the UK-EU deal is a system for doing more deals
Sir Keir Starmer’s “reset” is still a hard Brexit. It will need softening
The Senate should vote down Donald Trump’s reckless tax cuts
If it does not, a collision with the bond markets awaits